赋分评价法常被教师用于大学物理课程的学习质量评价，随着深度学习理论的发展，该种方法的适用性值得思考.

而SOLO(Structure of the Observed Learning Outcome，即“可观察的学习成果结构”)分类评价将学生在解题过程中的思维能力分为5 个层次，深度学习理论将这五个层次分为深度和浅层两种学习水平.基于SOLO 理论，本研究对大一学生解决某一力学问题时的思维能力进行分类，并对其学习的深度进行评价，再与赋分评价法进行比较，发现SOLO 分类评价不仅有明确的等级评定和详细全面的评价，还可通过可视的思维结构直观地测量学生达到教学目标的程度和学习的深度，因而更具科学性和可观察性，更适用于深度学习评价.

The quality of freshmen in college physics study is often evaluated with scores. With the development of deeper learning，another evaluation method which is based on the SOLO (Structure of the Observed Learning Outcome)taxonomy，divided students’thinking ability in the process of solving problems into five levels. The deeper learning theory divides these five levels into two levels：deep and shallow.Based on the above theory，this study classifies the thinking ability of freshmen when a mechanical problem is solved，evaluates the depth of their learning，and compares the above two evaluation methods and has found that the latter is more scientific，more observable and more suitable for teachers to evaluate the study of college physics for deeper learning.