大学物理 ›› 2025, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (1): 17-.doi: 10.16854/j.cnki.1000-0712.240096

• 教学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

达朗贝尔与斯托克斯佯谬的对比式教学探索

华蕾娜,王若愚   

  1. 1. 中国科学院过程工程研究所介科学与工程全国重点实验室,北京 100190;2. 中国科学院大学 化学工程学院,北京101408
  • 收稿日期:2024-03-01 修回日期:2024-05-10 出版日期:2025-03-20 发布日期:2025-03-25
  • 作者简介:华蕾娜(1980—),女,山东莱阳人,中国科学院过程工程研究所副研究员,博士,主要从事传递过程原理课程教学和多相流复杂体系的建模与仿真模拟研究工作.
  • 基金资助:
    中国科学院大学2023年管理支撑创新能力提升专项资助

Teaching application of comparing D′Alembert and Stokes paradox

HUA Lei-na1,2, WANG Ruo-yu2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Mesoscience and Engineering, Institute of Process Engineering,
    Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing.100190, China;
    2. School of Chemical Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 101408, China
  • Received:2024-03-01 Revised:2024-05-10 Online:2025-03-20 Published:2025-03-25

摘要: 达朗贝尔佯谬和斯托克斯佯谬是流体力学经典内容之一,也是实际教学中较易混淆的知识点. 本文以无界均匀流场中圆球绕流为例,以对比的方式给出有势流动和低雷诺数流动的核心假设、方程的导出、流场速度和压强分布的解析解等,并以云图量化两种流动的区别,厘清问题的假设如何导致了达朗贝尔佯谬和斯托克斯佯谬的产生. 将生动的佯谬与繁多的公式推导紧密结合,有助于学生激发追本溯源的好奇心、进而深化对理论及其局限性的理解.

关键词: 佯谬, 有势流动, 低雷诺数流动, 教学应用

Abstract: D’Alembert paradox and Stokes paradox are the classical contents in fluid mechanics, which are also the confusing parts in teaching. Using a fixed sphere in a uniform flow field as an example, we present the key assumptions, governing equations, solutions of flow velocity and pressure for potential flow and low Reynolds number flow, respectively. The contours are plotted to compare the hydrodynamics of flows. The qualitative and quantitative analysis clarifies the origins of D’Alembert paradox and Stokes paradox. The combination of paradox and formula derivation could stimulate students’ interesting and further improve the understanding of theory.

Key words: paradox, potential flow, low Reynolds number flow, teaching application