大学物理 ›› 2026, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (2): 44-.doi: 10.16854/j.cnki.1000-0712.250225

• 教学改革 • 上一篇    下一篇

课程思政引领下的大学物理教学改革实践

王飞,于永芹,蒋长勇   

  1. 深圳技术大学 大学物理教学实验中心,深圳518118
  • 收稿日期:2025-04-28 修回日期:2025-06-20 出版日期:2026-05-15 发布日期:2026-05-21
  • 作者简介:王飞(1988 -),男,广东深圳人,深圳技术大学大学物理教学实验中心讲师,博士,主要从事大学物理、大学物理实验教学和湍流热对流研究工作.
  • 基金资助:
    广东省教育厅2024年度质量工程建设项目“基于物理学原著探索实施大学物理课程思政”(粤教高函〔2024〕30号);深圳技术大学2024年度质量工程建设项目“基于物理学原著探索实施大学物理课程思政”(深技大教务发〔2024〕103号);深圳技术大学2024年青年教师培优项目.

Teaching reform in college physics under the guidance of curriculum #br# ideological and political education: A practical exploration#br#

WANG Fei, YU Yongqin, JIANG Changyong#br#   

  1. Physics Teaching and Experiment Center, Shenzhen Technology University, Shenzhen 518118
  • Received:2025-04-28 Revised:2025-06-20 Online:2026-05-15 Published:2026-05-21

摘要: 针对教学中出现的三大痛点问题:“重视刷题,轻视理解”、“不愿提问,问题积压”和“基础各异,众口难调”,大学物理课程实施创新改革.改革以课程思政为指引,以学生为中心,采取“挖掘物理原著,重视概念引入”、“关爱学生心理,鼓励质疑求知”和“提倡因材施教,分级知识管理”的方法,经过多轮实践检验,从学生评价,学生成绩和答疑积极性三个方面验证了方案的可行性和有效性.教学研究中发现,1对1预约答疑在补充课堂教学方面具有重要的作用:可以智能匹配教师和学生可用时间,照顾学生的隐私需求,引导学生提问,同时方便教师掌握真实学情,从而助力教学改进.未来仍需解决的是如何引导更多基础较差的学生积极提问.

关键词: 课程思政, 大学物理, 物理学原著, 教学改革

Abstract: To address three major challenges in physics education—students focus on repetitive problem-solving at the expense of true understanding, reluctance to ask questions resulting in the accumulation of unresolved issues, and diverse academic foundations making it difficult to meet all learning needs—innovative reforms are introduced into the college physics curriculum. Guided by the principles of integrating ideological and political education into the curriculum and adopting a student-centered approach, the reforms incorporated strategies such as exploring classical physics texts to emphasize the process of concept introduction, caring for students psychological well-being while encouraging inquiry-based learning, and implementing tiered management of knowledge according to students’ varying academic foundations. Through multiple rounds of practice, the effectiveness of these reforms is validated by improvements in student evaluations, academic performance, and engagement in consultations. The study further highlights the crucial role of one-on-one, appointment-based tutoring in supplementing classroom instruction: it enables intelligent scheduling, respects students privacy, fosters active inquiry, and allows instructors to gain an accurate understanding of students learning status, thereby supporting more targeted teaching improvements. A continuing challenge for future work is how to motivate students with weaker foundations to participate more actively in the questioning and learning process.


Key words: course ideology and politics, college physics, physics classics, teaching reform