大学物理 ›› 2025, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (9): 80-.doi: 10.16854/j.cnki.1000-0712.250019

• 教学改革 • 上一篇    下一篇

面向拔尖创新人才培养的大学物理课程思政教学评价定量分析研究#br#

郭巧能,陈秋芳,宋平新,王宇航,梁秋霞,王杰芳,单崇新   

  1. 郑州大学物理学院,河南 郑州450001
  • 收稿日期:2025-01-13 修回日期:2025-05-07 出版日期:2025-11-11 发布日期:2025-11-19
  • 作者简介:郭巧能(1966—),女,教授,博士,主要从事薄膜材料科学模拟和物理教学研究工作.
  • 基金资助:
    2023年度河南省本科高校研究性教改项目:基于兴趣-项目耦合驱动的研究性教学模式在高校理科基础课程中的改革实践(教高〔2023〕388 号-项目序号6)\];教育部高等学校物理学类专业教学指导委员会2023年物理学类力学课程研究会立项课题:将思政元素和美感元素融人力学教学中培养大学生创新能力探索和实践(课题编号:JZW-23-LX-l7);郑州大学2023 年度教育教学改革研究与实践重点项目:基于课程思政驱动力多学科全方位共促创新拔尖人才培养的教学实践研究(项目编号:2023ZZUJGXM047);郑州大学全国大学生创新创业训练计划资助项目(省级项目编号202510459078和202410459213)资助

Research on quantitative analysis of ideological and political teaching #br# evaluation in university physics courses oriented to the cultivation of top innovative talents#br#

GUO Qiaoneng, CHEN Qiufang, SONG Pingxin, WANG Yuhang, #br# LIANG Qiuxia, WANG Jiefang, SHAN Chongxin#br#   

  1. School of Physics, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001 Henan, China
  • Received:2025-01-13 Revised:2025-05-07 Online:2025-11-11 Published:2025-11-19

摘要: 从双一流高校拔尖创新人才培养出发,基于建构主义学习理论,结合科学美感素质培养,以学生为中心,确立课程思政教学评价关键因素.以基础理科类专业大学物理课程为例,构建课程思政多维评价指标体系.采用层次分析法计算各个指标的权重及层次权重总表,进行课程思政教学评价定量分析.本研究为高校对拔尖创新人才班课程思政教学设计提供参考借鉴和实践启示.

关键词: 拔尖创新人才, 建构主义学习理论, 课程思政, 教学评价, 层次分析法, 大学物理教学

Abstract: Starting from the cultivation of top-notch innovative talents in basic science at “Double First-Class” universities, and based on Constructivism learning theory, this study integrates the cultivation of scientific aesthetic quality, with a student-centered approach to identify the key factors for evaluating ideological and political education in courses. Using university physics courses for basic science majors as an example, a multi-dimensional evaluation index system for ideological and political education in the course is constructed. The Analytic Hierarchy Processis applied to calculate the weight of each index and the overall hierarchical weight table for quantitative analysis of the ideological and political education evaluation. This study provides reference and practical insights for the design of ideological and political education in courses aimed at cultivating top-tier innovative talents in universities.

Key words: top-notch innovative talents, constructivism learning theory, ideological and political education, teaching evaluation